When we go into meetings aiming to change people’s minds, they often object because their need for choice isn’t met. If we reframe our objectives to include finding solutions together, we can facilitate in a way that meets each person’s need for choice. Continue reading When people don’t engage in meetings, reframe your objectives to give them choice
When we use violent language to describe our work, we deny our autonomy. If we use the language of choice, we can affirm our autonomy and inspire others to do the same. Continue reading Use the language of choice to affirm your autonomy at work
When we tell people the “right” way to do things, we’re unlikely to get the help we need. Instead we can choose to show people how working with us can meet their needs. Continue reading Show people how working with you can meet their needs
When we advocate for “quality content”, we’re expressing our unmet needs by making a judgment. That doesn’t serve user needs.
During my talk at Confab Barcelona—”Use agile methods to work together on content” (slides below)—I suggested that in order to benefit from agile methods, we choose to “serve user need over content quality”:
— Elaine Larkin (@elainelarkin) September 30, 2014
Although most people in the room seemed to follow, a few objected: someone stated that user needs and quality are the same thing. Later a friend observed that my statement was provocative. I realised that I’m not interested in provoking people and I didn’t actually explain what I meant. I’ll do that here instead. Continue reading Advocating for “quality” content serves our unmet needs, not user needs